State Senate votes to repeal abortion notification law
SPRINGFIELD -- The Illinois Senate advanced a measure to repeal the state's Parental Notice of Abortion Act early Tuesday evening amid staunch opposition from Republicans and religious groups.
The repeal bill passed the Senate Executive Committee on a 9-6-1 vote Tuesday shortly after 5 p.m. and passed the full Senate 32-22 shortly after 8 p.m. Its future in the House was less certain as of Tuesday night.
The current law, the Parental Notice of Abortion Act of 1995, was passed decades ago but ultimately took effect only in 2013 after court challenges. It does not require parental consent, only that a doctor's office notify a parent of the child's planned abortion 48 hours prior to the procedure.
Discussion on the repeal bill, an amendment to House Bill 370, centered on whether a parent has the right to be informed by a medical professional if their child was scheduled for an abortion or whether the requirement needlessly puts at-risk youths in danger.
"This issue goes beyond the typical pro-life-versus-pro-choice debate," Republican Sen. Sue Rezin, of Morris, said in a news conference opposing repeal last week. "We're way past just discussing our views on abortion. We are literally now discussing if a parent has a right to know about their child's pregnancy and abortion."
Rezin and other GOP members of the committee questioned why a minor must have parental consent to get their ears pierced or to receive a vaccine, but would no longer be subject to parental notification of abortion under the repeal.
Emily Werth, a staff attorney at ACLU of Illinois, responded that in Illinois, a minor who is pregnant no longer has to receive parental consent for any medical care. The pregnant minor could undergo a Caesarean section, receive a vaccine or get any other medical care without parental notice or consent.
"And that is because the General Assembly has made the policy decision that when a young person is pregnant, it is in their best interests and all of our best interest that they have access to whatever medical care they need, without delay, without being put in harm's way," Werth said. "Abortion is one kind of medical care that they may need when they are pregnant. And it should be treated the same as any other kind of medical care."
There was also disagreement over whether the bill would help protect human trafficking victims or put them in greater danger.
Representatives of the ACLU and human trafficking victim advocates have argued that there has been no proven link that parental notification serves as a deterrent for sexual traffickers or abusers.
Rezin cited a story by human trafficking survivor Brook Bello, who previously testified that if her mother would have been notified when she was forced as a youth by her traffickers to get abortions decades ago, it may have helped free her from the situation.
"How would repealing this law not help human traffickers?" Rezin asked.
Sen. Elgie Sims, a Chicago Democrat and the bill's sponsor, responded that the bill would direct a newly created working group to look for policy solutions for human trafficking and resources to fund them.
The General Assembly also recently created a human trafficking task force, Sims said.
Advocates for repeal also argued in the committee that, in some cases, the parent or guardian is the person that is abusing or trafficking the child, and notifying them would create a dangerous situation.
Republicans pointed at exceptions in the existing law that they said are designed to protect victims.
The current law contains exceptions if the minor was a victim of physical or sexual abuse or neglect by an adult family member, if the minor is married or emancipated, or if the provider determines there is a medical emergency, or if an adult family member waives the notice in writing.
A judge can also waive the requirement and has done so approximately 575 times since the law took effect, Werth said.
Werth, who works with the ACLU of Illinois to assist minors in the judicial bypass process, said while bypass works for 99.8% of the individuals who initiate it, the number does not account for those who are unable to access it.
"The system is complicated and creates significant logistical and emotional burdens for young people," she said. "This number only reflects the young people who actually manage to get to court. There have been many who simply could not find a way to miss school to attend court during business hours without their parents being alerted."
Since the COVID-19 pandemic, court hearings have taken place online, making it even more difficult in some circumstances, she said. The court process also makes victims relive their pain, she said.
Ultimately, the bill passed the committee on a partisan 9-6-1 vote.
Faith leaders, including Springfield Bishop Thomas Paprocki, earlier in the day argued the parental notice law serves as a deterrent to abortion.
At a Capitol news conference, he characterized abortion as murder and said the parental notice act was about parental rights and protecting the mental health of the child.
"These laws exist because they protect children from making serious life-changing decisions that they are not yet equipped to make," he said. "These laws exist to protect the rights of parents to fulfill the duty that God has entrusted to them, and that no government can take away."
But advocates argued pregnant youths notify their parents willingly in the vast majority of situations.
"And that's not going to change," Werth said. "If we repeal the parental notice of abortion act in Illinois, a majority of young people will still choose to involve their parents, one or both parents, in this decision because that is their chosen and trusted support system."
Sims also noted the bill would create the Youth Health and Safety Advisory Working Group to "identify existing and needed resources for pregnant and parenting youth, and youth seeking reproductive health care."